K-12 Distant
Education
There
are efforts being made to improve the K-12 environment regarding distance
education. These efforts are a result of
the increased enrollment of distance learners.
Virtual schools are referred to as distance education and are one of the
fast growing areas for K-12. The
courses offered by virtual schools are part of a traditional school setting or
part of a virtual high school. There are
policy issues regarding funding as well as an overall resistance to distance
learning to be resolved. Most virtual K-12 schools are established and
funded by state governments which then require traditional schools to create
online programs. The success of online
programs is determined using the same measurements as those used for
traditional k-12 schools. These
measurements include the level of academic performance and achievement and retention
and satisfaction. I agree with the
opinions expressed in this article that the success of distance education is
more about who is teaching, who is learning and how that learning is being
accomplished (Huett, J., Moller, L., Foshay, W.
& Coleman, C. (2008, September/October).
The
online curriculum includes courses in elective and credit-recovery as well as
advance and remedial courses. There are
benefits for administration, students and teachers offered by K-12
education. Administrators can make sure
that the course content is aligned to state standards and that there are
resources for the high-risk students. Teachers
have more contact with students who would not normally communicate in f2f
classroom. The students have every tool
needed for success at hand and they can practice and move forward at their own
pace. The parents can see the assignment
and the resources available for their child (Huett,
J., Moller, L., Foshay, W. & Coleman, C. (2008, September/October).
There
are the virtual cyber-charter and home-school which are charter schools that
offer distance education to public school students. These schools operate independently and are not
a part of the local school district.
This writer agrees with the authors in that K-12 distant education could
become a place for students who cannot or will not try to function in the
traditional classroom setting. K-12 distant
education includes students from all walks of life—students who are hospitalized,
homebound, incarcerated and those who are being home schooled as well as those
who want to better their education (Huett, J.,
Moller, L., Foshay, W. & Coleman, C., 2008, September/October).
This
writer agrees with the authors that psychological and personal characteristics
of the K-12 learners may make it difficult for them to be successful online
learners. To be successful, the K-12
distant learners will need more supervision, easier instructions and an
extensive reinforcement system. The instructional design
professionals for K-12 distant education will need to work with academic
researchers to make sure that the students needs are met. The instructional
designers for K-12 distance education must instill learning practices based on
research and theory to be successful in teaching and learning (Huett, J., Moller, L., Foshay, W. & Coleman, C., 2008,
September/October).
This
writer agrees with the authors that we need better models for instruction that
can be used by learners. Many learners
today cannot interact with each other.
They can only interact with the instructor and/or content. Today, learners need more individualized and customized
learning that will cater to their interaction need (Moller,
L., Foshay, W., & Huett, J., 2008, May/June). The explosive growth
of distance education is changing post-secondary education as well. Distance education is concerned with new
pedagogical issues regarding student interactions, course design and delivery, communication, assignments and performance expectations. In addition to the pedagogical difference,
technology is used which may requires new skills for the teacher and the
learner Moller, L., Foshay, W., & Huett, J., 2008, May/June).
Comments posted to - msanglin.blogspot.com and conleyblog.weebly.com
References:
Huett, J., Moller, L., Foshay, W. & Coleman, C. (2008, September/October). The evolution of distance education: Implications for instructional design on the potential of the Web (Part 3: K12). TechTrends, 52(5), 63–67. Retrieved on March 10, 2013 http://ehis.ebscohost.com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org
Moller, L., Foshay, W., & Huett, J.
(2008, May/June). The evolution of distance education: Implications for
instructional design on the potential of the Web (Part 1: Training and
Development). TechTrends, 52(3), 70–75. Retrieved on March 10, 2013 from http://ehis.ebscohost.com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org
What I am finding is that there is also a shortage of software available that is cost effective (free) for teachers to design online learning. Core classes have more availability for available software than the elective courses. I do agree that it is very important to design online learning with the same amount of care and expertise as the Face 2 Face with the utilization of data driven and best practices for teaching and learning. We actually need trained instructional designers to work with content specialist (teachers)to create the online or distance education. I am very excited to be in the field of both teacher and instructional designer.
ReplyDeleteExcellent post. I never thought about the the ability of the student to only communicate one way. Great observation. I believe that the setup is flawed under the auspices of the system being afraid to give the students access. By this I mean, the system is so afraid of what the students might experience on the Internet that they limit what they can actually do while using the Internet.
ReplyDeleteHello Troy,
ReplyDeleteI agree that the system tries to limit what the students can do while on the Internet, but they are finding a way around those limits.
Thank you for your comments.