Assessing Collaborative Efforts
How should participation
in a collaborative learning community be assessed?
Instructors must
provide clear expectations by using rubrics or some other form of measurement
for assessing student work. Students will be more satisfied and instructor’s
assessment will be made easier when the assessment is in alignment with the
learning objectives and the collaborative activities (Pallloff and Pratt,
2005). An important way to assess and encourage collaborative learning is to have
an outcome or product for discussions which is graded. Individuals in the group
should be graded on individual contributions as well as group contribution
using rubrics (Swan, K., Shen, J., and Hiltz, R., n.d.).
How do the varying levels
of skill and knowledge students bring to a course affect the instructor's
"fair and equitable assessment" of learning?
The instructor must have an understanding of collaborative learning and
basic principles of student assessment that is aligned to the design of the
course. The students must come to the learning-centered course with at least
minimal skills and knowledge and be rooted in good practice (Palloff, R. and
Pratt, K., 2005). The fair and equitable assessment is based on more than
learning outcome. Instructors’ grading criteria should also include behaviors and
activities that are not measures of learning outcomes, such as attendance,
participation, improvement, or effort. These may be a part of the learning
outcomes but are not usually measures of learning outcomes. The instructor will
need to use different methods of assessment to analyze and assess the knowledge
and skills of the students (
http://www.cmu.edu/teaching). The interpretation of the assessment is in
the hands of the instructors or faculty members because they are familiar
with the knowledge of the course
learning goals as well as the assessment methods and materials. They decide on the appropriate standards and
can determine if the learning outcome is good or not (
http://www.cmu.edu/teaching).
If a student does not
want to network or collaborate in a learning community for an online course,
what should the other members of the learning community do? What role should
the instructor play? What impact would this have on his or her assessment plan?
There may be circumstances such as computer problems and family demands that
might present some participation challenges for the student. Hopefully, the instructor has laid the ground
work for such a time as this by getting a signed buy-in contract from the
student, for example. This would ensure
that the student is aware of the importance of the collaborative activity. The instructor should reach out to the
student via of a phone call or a simple email message to find the cause for not
wanting to participate. The other
members of the learning community should also try reaching out to the student
and “just communicate” with him/her to get specific reasons for not wanting to
participate. The student should have
already received and reviewed the rubrics and course information and thus be
aware of the course requirements including the collaboration portion (Palloff
& Pratt, 2005).
Instructional strategies may be as important as the
assessment in encouraging participation in small group activities in the online
classroom. Instructional strategies will also improve the group learning
experience and add other benefits such as helping students to achieve deeper
learning and to build their confidence and skills (
http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/675/1271).
Comments posted on April 10, 2013 to
http://dsprings2004.blogspot.com/
References:
Brindley, J.,
Walti, C., and Blaschke, L. (June, 2009). Creating effective
collaborative learning groups in an online environment. The International
Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning: A refereed e-journal to
advance research, theory, and practice in open and distance learning worldwide.
Retrieved on April 1, 2013 from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/675/1271
Enhancing
education: Whys & hows of assessment. Assessment of learning outcomes.
Retrieved on April 1, 2013 from http://www.cmu.edu/teaching
Palloff, R. and Pratt, K. (2005). Collaborating
Online: Learning together in community. San
Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
Hi Roger,
ReplyDeleteGreat post! I rely on using rubrics in my everyday teaching and learning. I think it serves as a solid outline of expected outcomes. As a classroom teacher, I know the strengths and struggles of my students, and it becomes easy to interpret what a student meant to do or say on an assessment. When I find myself in those situations, I step back and look at the rubric. All uncertainties and emotions can be null if I look just at the work submitted. In the past, I’ve traded classroom assessments to avoid bias, but I think it is also important to consider the level of skills and knowledge where the student started and compare it to their level at the end of the course to see their gains. It is important for instructors to evaluate themselves as well to determine if there should be any adjustments in how they deliver or facilitate the content for collaborative learning.
It may just be selfish of me, but I can't fathom reaching out to a classmate who is not participating. Maybe I'm not buying in to the community aspect of distance learning, but it's not my problem if the other people don't participate.
ReplyDeleteI agree that rubrics are very helpful in guiding our online community participation. Nice post!